Dail v. Adams Building Corp.

2 Citing cases

  1. Pitco Production Co. v. Chaparral Energy

    2003 OK 5 (Okla. 2003)   Cited 134 times
    Following Okla. Stat. tit. 15, ยง 160

    When particular persons or things are specified in a law, contract, or will, an intention to exclude all others may be inferred. Dail v. Adams Bldg. Corp., 1947 OK 309, 195 P.2d 755, 759, 200 Okla. 452 (Riley, J., dissenting). Other jurisdictions have applied this canon of construction to contracts as well as to statutes.

  2. Jacobson's Lifetime Buildings v. City of Tulsa

    1958 OK 285 (Okla. 1958)   Cited 6 times

    , 304 P.2d 967. See too, Dail v. Adams Bldg, Corp., 200 Okla. 451, 195 P.2d 755. The sewer facilities constructed by this plaintiff were owned by it, as its contract with the city expressly noted, and the city was to become the owner and operator only upon the occurrence of certain stated contingencies.