From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daikin Indus., Ltd. v. Chemours Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 8, 2019
2018-1389 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 8, 2019)

Opinion

2018-1389

08-08-2019

DAIKIN INDUSTRIES, LTD., DAIKIN AMERICA, INC., Appellants v. THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC, Appellee

ANTHONY F. LO CICERO, Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellants. Also represented by MARION P. METELSKI. DIPU A. DOSHI, Blank Rome LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by JONATHAN W.S. ENGLAND, MICHAEL S. MARCUS.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-00452.

JUDGMENT

ANTHONY F. LO CICERO, Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellants. Also represented by MARION P. METELSKI. DIPU A. DOSHI, Blank Rome LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by JONATHAN W.S. ENGLAND, MICHAEL S. MARCUS. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, PLAGER and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 8, 2019

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Daikin Indus., Ltd. v. Chemours Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 8, 2019
2018-1389 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 8, 2019)
Case details for

Daikin Indus., Ltd. v. Chemours Co.

Case Details

Full title:DAIKIN INDUSTRIES, LTD., DAIKIN AMERICA, INC., Appellants v. THE CHEMOURS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 8, 2019

Citations

2018-1389 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 8, 2019)