From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daigle v. U.S. Vets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Sep 26, 2012
CIV NO. 12-00153 ACK-KSC (D. Haw. Sep. 26, 2012)

Opinion

CIV NO. 12-00153 ACK-KSC

09-26-2012

MARTIN J. DAIGLE, Plaintiff(s), v. U.S. VETS; CLOUDBREAK LLC, Defendant(s).


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION AS CLARIFIED

Findings and Recommendation having been filed and service attempted on all parties on August 22, 2012, and no objections having been filed by any party,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Findings and Recommendations To Dismiss Action" (Doc. Entry [24]) are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. Specifically, this action is dismissed WITH prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, September 26, 2012.

_____________

Alan C. Kay

Sr. United States District Judge
Daigle v. U.S. Vets, et al., Civ. No. 12-00153 ACK-KSC: Order Adopting F&R as Clarified


Summaries of

Daigle v. U.S. Vets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Sep 26, 2012
CIV NO. 12-00153 ACK-KSC (D. Haw. Sep. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Daigle v. U.S. Vets

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN J. DAIGLE, Plaintiff(s), v. U.S. VETS; CLOUDBREAK LLC, Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Date published: Sep 26, 2012

Citations

CIV NO. 12-00153 ACK-KSC (D. Haw. Sep. 26, 2012)