From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daigle v. Metropolitan Property Casualty Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Dec 5, 2000
763 A.2d 1037 (Conn. 2000)

Opinion

Decided December 5, 2000


The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 60 Conn. App. 465 (AC 19529), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court correctly granted the defendant's motion in limine preventing the plaintiff from introducing his income tax returns?"

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16435.

Ronald F. Ochsner, in support of the petition.

D. Lincoln Woodard, in opposition.


Summaries of

Daigle v. Metropolitan Property Casualty Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Dec 5, 2000
763 A.2d 1037 (Conn. 2000)
Case details for

Daigle v. Metropolitan Property Casualty Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD DAIGLE v . METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Dec 5, 2000

Citations

763 A.2d 1037 (Conn. 2000)
255 Conn. 915

Citing Cases

Daigle v. Metropolitan Property Casualty Ins. Co.

We granted certification to appeal limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly conclude…