From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dagulo v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 19, 2020
No. 20-1670 (4th Cir. Nov. 19, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-1670

11-19-2020

MARIO RANESES DAGULO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.

Mario Raneses Dagulo, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:18-cv-00366-RGD-LRL) Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mario Raneses Dagulo, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mario Raneses Dagulo appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint in which he alleged medical malpractice and violations of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dagulo v. United States, No. 2:18-cv-00366-RGD-LRL (E.D. Va. Apr. 17, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Dagulo v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 19, 2020
No. 20-1670 (4th Cir. Nov. 19, 2020)
Case details for

Dagulo v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MARIO RANESES DAGULO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 19, 2020

Citations

No. 20-1670 (4th Cir. Nov. 19, 2020)