From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D'Agostino v. D'Agostino

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County
Jan 5, 1940
173 Misc. 312 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1940)

Opinion

January 5, 1940.

Joseph D. di Napoli, for the plaintiff.

Aaron L. Gitenstein, for the defendant.


In an action to annul a marriage for fraudulently concealing pregnancy, plaintiff husband seeks a blood grouping test. Defendant opposes because plaintiff has not complied with the order of this court dated December 1, 1939, awarding temporary alimony and counsel fee. Section 306-a of the Civil Practice Act provides that "wherever it shall be relevant to the prosecution * * * of an action" the court " shall direct" such test. Under the circumstances the motion will be granted and the defendant relegated to her other remedies to enforce the provisions of the order. The court will name a physician in the order to be entered hereon, which order shall provide that his fee shall be paid by the plaintiff in advance. Said physician shall submit a report of his findings to counsel for both sides. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

D'Agostino v. D'Agostino

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County
Jan 5, 1940
173 Misc. 312 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1940)
Case details for

D'Agostino v. D'Agostino

Case Details

Full title:SANTO D'AGOSTINO, Plaintiff, v. ELVIA D'AGOSTINO, Defendant

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County

Date published: Jan 5, 1940

Citations

173 Misc. 312 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1940)
17 N.Y.S.2d 905

Citing Cases

Shanks v. State

This case was decided in 1939, and was very severely criticized in an article in the Iowa Law Review, May,…