From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D'Agostin v. Hernandez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 29, 2011
440 F. App'x 598 (9th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 07-56469.

Submitted June 15, 2011.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

June 29, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding D.C. No. CV-04-02051-LAB.

Before: CANBY, O'SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


California state prisoner Harry D'Agostin appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

D'Agostin contends that the Board of Prison Terms ("Board") found him unsuitable for parole in 2002 and that its determination, made pursuant to California's Determinate Sentencing Law ("DSL") and implementing regulations, violated the Ex Post Facto Clause because his chances of parole were greater under the Indeterminate Sentencing Law ("ISL"), which was in effect at the time of his offense. This claim fails because D'Agostin has not established that "as applied to his own sentence the [DSL] created a significant risk of increasing his punishment." Garner v. Jones, 529 U.S. 244, 255 (2000); see also Connor v. Estelle, 981 F.2d 1032, 1034 (9th Cir. 1992) (per curiam) ("[A]pplication of the DSL parole-suitability guidelines to prisoners sentenced under the ISL . . . does not violate the federal constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws."). A fortiori, he cannot establish that the state court decision denying his claims either was contrary to or involved an unreasonable application of clearly established Supreme Court precedent. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d).

We construe D'Agostin's additional arguments as a motion to expand the certificate of appealability. So construed, the motion is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 22-1(e); see also Swarthout v. Cooke, 131 S. Ct. 859, 862-63 (2011) (per curiam); Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir. 1999) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

D'Agostin v. Hernandez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 29, 2011
440 F. App'x 598 (9th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

D'Agostin v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:HARRY D'AGOSTIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. ROBERT J. HERNANDEZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 29, 2011

Citations

440 F. App'x 598 (9th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. Spearman

D'Agostin v. Hernandez, 2007 WL 2481461, *9 (S.D.Cal. Aug. 29, 2007), aff'd, 440 Fed.Appx. 598 (9th Cir.…