From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daehnick v. Newbill

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 4, 1999
989 S.W.2d 954 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 74473.

ORDER FILED: May 4, 1999.

APPEAL FROM: THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION.

William E. McCurdy, St. Louis, for Appellant.

James P. Krupp, Alan J. Downs, Cynthia A. Quetsch, St. Louis, for Respondent.

Alan J. Downs, Cynthia A. Quetsch, Division of Employment Security, 505 Washington Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63101-1298, ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT.

Before Paul J. Simon, P.J., and Kathianne Knaup Crane and Lawrence E. Mooney, JJ.


ORDER


Melanie R. Newbill, D.D.S. (employer) appeals from three orders of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming and adopting three corresponding decisions of the Appeals Tribunal, which determined that Ursula Daehnick (claimant) was eligible for unemployment benefits and not disqualified following her discharge from work. After the Commission issued its orders, the Division of Employment Security was made a party on appeal, pursuant to section 288.210 RSMo 1994. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that no error of law appears. Because an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.


Summaries of

Daehnick v. Newbill

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 4, 1999
989 S.W.2d 954 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Daehnick v. Newbill

Case Details

Full title:URSULA DAEHNICK AND DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, RESPONDENTS, v…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: May 4, 1999

Citations

989 S.W.2d 954 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)