From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dachille v. Supinsky

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 16, 2021
327 So. 3d 977 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D21-408

11-16-2021

Curt DACHILLE, Petitioner, v. Jacqueline SUPINSKY, Respondent.

Kansas R. Gooden of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Miami; Kevin D. Franz of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Boca Raton; Carla Newman of The Law Offices of Robert J. Smith, Jacksonville, for Petitioner. Brian J. Lee and Jason S. Miller of Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Jacksonville, for Respondent.


Kansas R. Gooden of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Miami; Kevin D. Franz of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Boca Raton; Carla Newman of The Law Offices of Robert J. Smith, Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Brian J. Lee and Jason S. Miller of Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Jacksonville, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DENIED . See Younkin v. Blackwelder , ––– So.3d ––––, 46 Fla. L. Weekly S291, 2021 WL 4782799 (Fla. Oct. 14, 2021) ; Dodgen v. Grijalva , ––– So.3d ––––, 46 Fla. L. Weekly S293, 2021 WL 4782479 (Fla. Oct. 14, 2021).

Rowe, C.J., and Roberts and Jay, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dachille v. Supinsky

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 16, 2021
327 So. 3d 977 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Dachille v. Supinsky

Case Details

Full title:Curt DACHILLE, Petitioner, v. Jacqueline SUPINSKY, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Nov 16, 2021

Citations

327 So. 3d 977 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)