From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dach v. City of Richmond

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 28, 2011
No. C09-0171 JSC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. C09-0171 JSC

11-28-2011

Uriah Dach, et al., Plaintiff(s), v. City of Richmond, et al., Defendant(s).


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jacqueline Scott Corley

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Dach v. City of Richmond

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 28, 2011
No. C09-0171 JSC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Dach v. City of Richmond

Case Details

Full title:Uriah Dach, et al., Plaintiff(s), v. City of Richmond, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 28, 2011

Citations

No. C09-0171 JSC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2011)