From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dach v. City of Richmond

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 8, 2011
No: C-09-00171 JSC (NJV) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011)

Opinion

No: C-09-00171 JSC (NJV)

11-08-2011

URIAH DACH, DECEASED, THROUGH HIS SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST, TIMOTHY DACH AND ELAINE DACH; TIMOTHY DACH, Individually; and ELAINE DACH, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF RICHMOND, a public entity, POLICE OFFICER LOUIE TIRONA, Individually, POLICE OFFICER JOHN BRUCE, Individually, POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER DECIOUS, Individually, POLICE OFFICER GARD, Individually, and DOES 1 through 10, Jointly and Severally, Defendants.

HADDAD & SHERWIN MICHAEL J. HADDAD Attorneys for Plaintiffs MCNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, PFALZER, BORGES & BROTHERS LLP NOAH G. BLECHMAN Attorneys for Defendants


MICHAEL J. HADDAD (State Bar No. 189114)

JULIA SHERWIN (State Bar No. 189268)

GINA ALTOMARE (State Bar No. 273099)

HADDAD & SHERWIN

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Hon. Jacqueline Scott Corley


STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS'

MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The parties have scheduled a mediation to take place on November 10, 2011 with the Honorable Wayne D. Brazil of JAMS. In light of the upcoming mediation and to conserve attorneys fees and costs in this matter, the parties, by and through their respective counsel, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, stipulate to the following modifications to the briefing schedule for Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, which was filed on November 3, 2011:

Plaintiffs' Opposition to be Filed: November 23, 2011

Defendants' Reply to be Filed: December 1, 2011

The previously noticed hearing date and time shall remain December 15, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. These brief extensions of time would have no effect on the case schedule.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

HADDAD & SHERWIN

MICHAEL J. HADDAD

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

MCNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY,

PFALZER, BORGES & BROTHERS LLP

NOAH G. BLECHMAN

Attorneys for Defendants

(PROPOSED) ORDER

By stipulation and agreement of all parties to this action, this Court hereby adopts the above-stipulated briefing deadlines as its order in this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED.

HON. JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Dach v. City of Richmond

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 8, 2011
No: C-09-00171 JSC (NJV) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Dach v. City of Richmond

Case Details

Full title:URIAH DACH, DECEASED, THROUGH HIS SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST, TIMOTHY DACH AND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 8, 2011

Citations

No: C-09-00171 JSC (NJV) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2011)