Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Da Silva Soares v. Cont'l Motors, Inc.

C. A. K19C-12-028 NEP (Del. Super. Ct. Dec. 17, 2021)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Da Silva Soares v. Cont'l Motors, Inc.

5 Citing cases

  1. Cont'l Motors, Inc. v. Soares

    No. 17 (Del. Feb. 2, 2022)

    There was also a third defendant, Technify Motors (USA), Inc., that merged with Continental in 2018 and was dissolved.Soares v. Cont'l Motors, Inc., 2021 WL 6015701 (Del. Super. Ct. Dec. 17, 2021). (2) This action arises from the crash of an aircraft in Turks and Caicos Islands ("TCI") on December 23, 2017.

  2. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am. v. Blackbaud, Inc.

    C. A. N22C-12-130 KMM (Del. Super. Ct. Mar. 27, 2024)   Cited 2 times

    See Soares v. Continental Motors, Inc., 2021 WL 6015701, at *1, 11 (Del. Super. Dec. 17, 2021) (finding that further discovery was required before a choice-of-law determination was appropriate). B. Rule 12(c) Standard of Review

  3. Suppi Constr. v. EC Devs. I

    C. A. N18L-11-009 KMM (Del. Super. Ct. Mar. 4, 2024)   Cited 1 times

    Thus, to the extent that the discussion below is dictum, it is judicial dictum intended to provide guidance to the parties. See Soares v. Continental Motors, Inc., 2021 WL 6015701, at *9 (Del. Super. Dec. 17, 2021) (noting the contrast between obiter dictum, which are statements not necessary to the determination of a case and judicial dictum, which are statements made after careful consideration and for future guidance in the litigation); see also In re Viacom, Inc. S'holders Litig., 2020 WL 7711128, at *12 (Del. Ch. Dec. 30, 2020) (same). However, simply because some part of a contact is illegal (and thus void) does not mean that the entire contract is unenforceable.

  4. Da Silva Soares v. Cont'l Motors, Inc.

    C. A. K19C-12-028 NEP (Del. Super. Ct. May. 3, 2023)

    See Soares v. Cont'l Motors, Inc., 2021 WL 6015701, at *1-2 (Del. Super. Dec. 17, 2021). Id. at *3.

  5. Soares v. Cont'l Motors, Inc.

    C. A. K19C-12-028 NEP (Del. Super. Ct. Jan. 18, 2022)   Cited 2 times
    Indicating that "a motion to determine choice of law, if appropriate, would be ripe for decision" after the case is further developed through discovery

    Soares v. Cont'l Motors, Inc., 2021 WL 6015701, at *8 n.83 (Del. Super. Dec. 17, 2021) (quoting Oral Arg. Tr. at 24).Id. at *10 n.90 (quoting Oral Arg. Tr. at 43).