From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D. G. Sweigert v. Goodman

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 23, 2024
1:23-cv-06881-JGK-VF (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2024)

Opinion

1:23-cv-06881-JGK-VF 23-cv-05875-JGK-VF

01-23-2024

D. G. Sweigert Plaintiff, v. Jason Goodman, Defendant

D. G. SWEIGERT PRO SE PLAINTIFF


D. G. SWEIGERT PRO SE PLAINTIFF

John G. Koeltl Judge

PLAINTIFF'S SECOND REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE PURSUANT TO F.R.E. 201 (B)

Valerie Figueredo Magistrate Judge

In light of Defendant Goodman's docketing of his motion to intervene in Kennedy v. Biden, the pro se Plaintiff (undersigned) attaches truthful and accurate copies of relevant judicial orders for this Court's consideration. These attachments represent undisputed facts. The Plaintiff requests that this Court take notice of the orders themselves pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence (F.R.E.) Rule 201 (b)(1) - (2). These adjudicative findings involve the immediate parties.

SO ORDERED

Plaintiff's request for the court to take judicial notice of “relevant judicial orders” is premature. Defendant has not yet answered the complaint and there is no pending motion for the court to adjudicate. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the letter motion at ECF No. 107.


Summaries of

D. G. Sweigert v. Goodman

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 23, 2024
1:23-cv-06881-JGK-VF (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2024)
Case details for

D. G. Sweigert v. Goodman

Case Details

Full title:D. G. Sweigert Plaintiff, v. Jason Goodman, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 23, 2024

Citations

1:23-cv-06881-JGK-VF (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 23, 2024)