From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D D Recreation, Inc. v. Royal Globe Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1976
54 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

November 1, 1976


In an action on a fire insurance policy issued by defendant covering a nursery school operated by plaintiff, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 21, 1976, which denied its motion to strike specified items from plaintiff's demand for a bill of particulars. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. The purpose of a bill of particulars is to amplify the pleadings, limit the proof and prevent surprise at the trial but not to provide evidentiary material (Cirelli v Victory Mem. Hosp., 45 A.D.2d 856; Belott v State of New York, 40 A.D.2d 729; State of New York v Horsemen's Benevolent Protective Assn. [N.Y. Div.], 34 A.D.2d 769). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Damiani, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

D D Recreation, Inc. v. Royal Globe Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1976
54 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

D D Recreation, Inc. v. Royal Globe Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:D D RECREATION, INC., Respondent, v. ROYAL GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Zavala v. Chemical Bank

The purpose of a bill of particulars is to amplify the pleadings, limit the proof and prevent surprise at…

Exact Value, Inc. v. Chemical Bank

The purpose of a bill of particulars is to amplify the pleadings, limit the proof and prevent surprise at…