Opinion
2D22-63
12-16-2022
CATHERINE ELIZABETH CZYZ; THE CZYZ LAW FIRM, P.A.; and THE CZYZ LAW FIRM, PLLC, Appellants, v. ERIN BETH NEITZELT, Appellee.
Catherine Elizabeth Czyz, pro se. Wienna Jane Ingraham, Orlando, for Appellants The Czyz Law Firm, P.A., and The Czyz Law Firm, PLLC. Scott E. Atwood of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellee.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Lee County; James Shenko, Judge.
Catherine Elizabeth Czyz, pro se.
Wienna Jane Ingraham, Orlando, for Appellants The Czyz Law Firm, P.A., and The Czyz Law Firm, PLLC.
Scott E. Atwood of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellee.
ORDER OF THE COURT
IT IS ORDERED that the mandate is withdrawn. Appellant Catherine Elizabeth Czyz's motion for clarification filed December 13, 2022, is denied. On the court's own motion, the opinion issued November 16, 2022, is withdrawn and the attached opinion is substituted in its place.
No further motions for rehearing will be entertained and the clerk is directed to issue the mandate contemporaneously.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING IS A TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL COURT ORDER.
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Dismissed. See Fla. Agric & Mech Univ, Bd of Trs v United Fac of Fla, 301 So.3d 1030, 1031-32 (Fla 1st DCA 2019); Cordero v Washington Mut Bank, 241 So.3d 967, 968 (Fla 3d DCA 2018)
KELLY, ATKINSON, and LABRIT, JJ, Concur
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.