From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Czerski v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 2003
765 N.Y.S.2d 312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CA 03-00262

October 2, 2003.

Appeal from that part of an order of Supreme Court, Oneida County (Shaheen, J.), entered April 26, 2002, that denied the motion of defendant City of Rome for summary judgment on the issue of proximate cause.

JAMES S. RIZZO, CORPORATION COUNSEL, ROME, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PAUL L. PILECKAS, ROME, FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (KEVIN R. VAN DUSER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: HURLBUTT, J.P., SCUDDER, KEHOE, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ.


ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.


Summaries of

Czerski v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 2003
765 N.Y.S.2d 312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Czerski v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:CLARA CZERSKI AND FELIX CZERSKI, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ROCCO CLARK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 2, 2003

Citations

765 N.Y.S.2d 312 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)