From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Czerniejewski v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Sep 19, 2008
07-CV-476A (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 19, 2008)

Opinion

07-CV-476A.

September 19, 2008


ORDER


The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On August 28, 2008, Magistrate Judge McCarthy filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings be denied and that plaintiff's cross-motion be granted in part and denied in part.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge McCarthy's Report and Recommendation, defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied and plaintiff's cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted in part and denied in part.

In accordance with Magistrate Judge McCarthy's Report and Recommendation, the case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The Clerk of Court is directed to take all steps necessary to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Czerniejewski v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Sep 19, 2008
07-CV-476A (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 19, 2008)
Case details for

Czerniejewski v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CARL CZERNIEJEWSKI, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, et al., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Sep 19, 2008

Citations

07-CV-476A (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 19, 2008)

Citing Cases

Perry v. Berryhill

Accordingly, it was error for ALJ Seeley to conclude Plaintiff was not disabled prior to May 14, 2014,…