Opinion
Civil Action No. 10-cv-03115-RPM
08-08-2011
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Upon consideration of the plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a second amended complaint [27], filed June 30, 2011, and the defendants' oppositions and because the purpose of the motion is to make separate claims for exemplary damages and exemplary damages are not a basis for a separate claim for relief but only are considered as possible relief dependent upon the evidence at trial, it is
ORDERED that the motion fo file a second amended complaint is denied.
BY THE COURT:
Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge