From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cyrus v. Dorazio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2000
269 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted December 22, 1999

February 17, 2000

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Michael Dorazio appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), dated July 28, 1998, which granted the plaintiff's motion to vacate the automatic dismissal of the action pursuant to CPLR 3404 N.Y.CPLR and to restore the action to the calendar.

Norman A. Kaplan, Great Neck, N.Y., for appellant.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the action is dismissed.

Before a court may grant a motion to vacate the dismissal of an action pursuant to CPLR 3404 N.Y.CPLR, the plaintiff must establish all of the following: (1) a meritorious cause of action, (2) a reasonable excuse for the delay in prosecution of the action, (3) a lack of intent to abandon the action, and (4) a lack of prejudice to the defendant (see, Diamond v. J.B.J. Mgt. Co., 220 A.D.2d 378). The plaintiff failed to establish these elements.


Summaries of

Cyrus v. Dorazio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2000
269 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Cyrus v. Dorazio

Case Details

Full title:STEPHANIE CYRUS, respondent, v. MICHAEL DORAZIO, appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 17, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
702 N.Y.S.2d 903

Citing Cases

Lopez v. Imperial Delivery Service, Inc.

In the first line of cases, this court has properly held that CPLR 3404 is inapplicable to pre-note of issue…