From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cyril v. Neighborhood Partnership Housing Fund, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 2003
309 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-04038

Argued September 22, 2003.

October 20, 2003.

In an action, inter alia, to recover for damage to property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated April 1, 2002, which, inter alia, denied his motion for a preliminary injunction.

Okolie Cyril, Corona, N.Y., appellant pro se.

James E. Kasdon, New York, N.Y., for respondents.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, SONDRA MILLER, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs.

The plaintiff's appeal has been rendered academic as a result of the affirmance by the Appellate Term, Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, of the judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, awarding possession of the premises in question to the owner ( see Neighborhood Partnership Housing Development Fund Corp. v. Okolie, 2003 N.Y. Slip Op 50707[U]). In any event, the plaintiff failed to show that he was entitled to a preliminary injunction ( see Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Capasso, 75 N.Y.2d 860, 862; Somers Stained Glass Corp. v. Somers Design, 277 A.D.2d 442, 443).

RITTER, J.P., FLORIO, S. MILLER and LUCIANO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cyril v. Neighborhood Partnership Housing Fund, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 2003
309 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Cyril v. Neighborhood Partnership Housing Fund, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:OKOLIE CYRIL, appellant, v. NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP HOUSING FUND, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 20, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 828 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
766 N.Y.S.2d 66

Citing Cases

Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Style Mgmt. Assocs. Corp.

Plaintiff required leave to amend its Bill of Particulars since a Note of Issue had been filed. See CPLR §…