From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cypress Semiconductor Corp. v. Deutsche Bank Sec. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Oct 25, 2011
Case Number CV-11-617-CW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)

Opinion

Case Number CV-11-617-CW

10-25-2011

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC., a Delaware Corporation, DEUTSCHE BANK ALEX. BROWN, a Division of Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., and DEUTSCHE BANK AG, Defendants.

William J. Goines (SBN 61290) GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP Attorneys for Defendants


William J. Goines (SBN 61290)

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

Attorneys for Defendants

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT


Honorable Claudia Wilken

Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, on June 2, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' initial stipulation extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint in this action to July 11, 2011; and

WHEREAS, on July 8, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' second stipulation extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint in this action through and including August 24, 2011; and

WHEREAS, on September 1, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' third stipulation extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint in this action through and including September 23, 2011; and

WHEREAS, on September 29, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' fourth stipulation extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint in this action through and including October 24, 2011; and

WHEREAS the parties have made substantial progress towards a final resolution of this dispute, and believe that an additional thirty (30) days would permit them to finally resolve this dispute; and

WHEREAS, accordingly, Defendants have met and conferred with Plaintiff and requested an additional 30-day extension of the time for all Defendants to move against, answer or respond to the Complaint (through and including November 23, 2011); and

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has consented to Defendants' request;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendants, through their respective counsel, and subject to Court approval, that the time for all Defendants to move against, answer or respond to the Complaint shall be extended from October 24, 2011 through and including November 23, 2011.

In accordance with General Order 45 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the undersigned counsel.

Respectfully submitted,

By Philip J. Wang (SBN 218349)

Justin S. Chang (SBN 205925)

WANG & CHANG, A PROFESSIONAL

LAW CORPORATION

One Maritime Plaza, Suite 825

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 599-2832

Facsimile: (415) 599-2829

phil@wangchanglaw.com

jchang@wangchanglaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

By William J. Goines (SBN 61290)

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

1900 University Avenue, 5th Floor

East Palo Alto, CA 94303

Telephone: (650) 328-8500

Facsimile: (650) 328-8508

goinesw@gtlaw.com

- and

Stephen L. Saxl (Pro Hac Vice Motion

To Be Filed)

Toby S. Soli (Pro Hac Vice Motion

To Be Filed)

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

200 Park Avenue

New York, New York 10166

Telephone: (212) 801-9200

Facsimile: (212) 801-6400

saxls@gtlaw.com

solit@gtlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendants

ATTESTATION CLAUSE

I, William J. Goines, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Philip J. Wang has concurred in this filing.

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

By: William J. Goines

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Honorable Claudia Wilken

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cypress Semiconductor Corp. v. Deutsche Bank Sec. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Oct 25, 2011
Case Number CV-11-617-CW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Cypress Semiconductor Corp. v. Deutsche Bank Sec. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

Case Number CV-11-617-CW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)