From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cypress Semiconductor Corp. v. Deutsche Bank Sec. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 23, 2011
Case Number CV-11-617-CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)

Opinion

Case Number CV-11-617-CW

11-23-2011

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC., a Delaware Corporation, DEUTSCHE BANK ALEX. BROWN, a Division of Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., and DEUTSCHE BANK AG, Defendants.

William J. Goines (SBN 61290) GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP Attorneys for Defendants


William J. Goines (SBN 61290)

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

Attorneys for Defendants

(Case Assigned to Hon. Claudia Wilken)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND ADJOURNING NOVEMBER 29, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, on June 2, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' initial stipulation extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint in this action to July 11, 2011; and

WHEREAS, on July 8, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' second stipulation extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint in this action through and including August 24, 2011; and

WHEREAS, on September 1, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' third stipulation extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint in this action through and including September 23, 2011; and

WHEREAS, on September 29, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' fourth stipulation extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint in this action through and including October 24, 2011; and

WHEREAS, on October 25, 2011, the Court So Ordered the parties' fifth stipulation extending the time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint in this action through and including November 23, 2011; and

WHEREAS the parties have now reached agreement on the terms of a settlement and anticipate filing a stipulation of dismissal within fourteen (14) days; and

WHEREAS, accordingly, Defendants have met and conferred with Plaintiff and requested an additional 30-day extension of the time for all Defendants to move against, answer or respond to the Complaint (through and including December 23, 2011), by which time the parties anticipate having filed a stipulation of dismissal; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has consented to Defendants' request; and

WHEREAS the Court had scheduled an initial Case Management Conference for November 29, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.; and

WHEREAS the parties believe that there will be no need for a Case Management Conference because a stipulation of dismissal will be filed within fourteen (14) days;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendants, through their respective counsel, and subject to Court approval, that the time for all Defendants to move against, answer or respond to the Complaint shall be extended from November 23, 2011 through and including December 23, 2011; and

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the Case Management Conference scheduled for November 29, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. shall be adjourned.

In accordance with General Order 45 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the undersigned counsel.

Respectfully submitted,

Philip J. Wang (SBN 218349)

Justin S. Chang (SBN 205925)

WANG & CHANG, A PROFESSIONAL

LAW CORPORATION

Attorneys for Plaintiff

William J. Goines (SBN 61290)

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

- and

Stephen L. Saxl (Not admitted in N.D. Cal.)

Toby S. Soli (Not admitted in N.D. Cal.)

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

Attorneys for Defendants

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. A case management conference will be held on Wednesday, January 18, 2012, at 2:00 p.m.

The Huriorable Claudia Wilken

United States District Judge

ATTESTATION CLAUSE

I, William J. Goines, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND ADJOURNING NOVEMBER 29, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Philip J. Wang has concurred in this filing.

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

By: William J. Goines


Summaries of

Cypress Semiconductor Corp. v. Deutsche Bank Sec. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 23, 2011
Case Number CV-11-617-CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Cypress Semiconductor Corp. v. Deutsche Bank Sec. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Nov 23, 2011

Citations

Case Number CV-11-617-CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)