Opinion
2011-1568, -1598
02-13-2012
CY TECHNOLOGT GROUP, LLC AND MOBGOB, LLC, Plaintiffs /Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants, AND RICHARD YOON, SCOTT CHUNG AND TED CHUNG, Third Party Defendants-Appellees, v. GROUPON, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant/Third Party Plaintiff-Cross Appellant.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in case no. 10-CV-7287, Senior Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer.
ON MOTION
ORDER
This court construes the letter from counsel for plaintiffs and third-party defendants dated January 17, 2012, as a motion to reform the caption. We also consider whether a special briefing schedule should issue.
The appellants and appellees are represented by the same firm. The appellees (who state that they are in opposition to the cross-appellant only) should file a combined responsive brief with the appellants that responds to the cross-appellant's opening brief.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.
(2) The appellants and appellees must file a combined response brief in response to the cross-appellant's opening brief. That combined response brief is due within 40 days of service of the cross-appellant's opening brief and may not exceed 14,000 words.
FOR THE COURT
_________________
Jan Horbaly
Clerk
cc: Alexander C. D. Giza, Esq.
David B. Abel, Esq.
s23