From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cwanek v. Kopnak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 20, 1956
3 A.D.2d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Opinion

December 20, 1956

Appeal from the Erie Special Term.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Williams, JJ.


Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and motion denied with $10 costs, without prejudice to such further motions against the answer as the plaintiff may be advised. Memorandum: It is our opinion that rule 104 is not the proper rule under which to move to attack the answer which contains a counterclaim. All concur.


Summaries of

Cwanek v. Kopnak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 20, 1956
3 A.D.2d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)
Case details for

Cwanek v. Kopnak

Case Details

Full title:WALTER J. CWANEK, Doing Business as URBAN ROOFING CONSTRUCTION CO.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1956

Citations

3 A.D.2d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Citing Cases

RHO REALTY CORP. v. H-M-C CORP

Since the pleading contains a counterclaim, this rule does not apply. ( Cwanek v. Kopnak, 3 A.D.2d 645,…