From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cutts v. McGhee

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1942
20 S.E.2d 376 (N.C. 1942)

Opinion

(Filed 5 June, 1942.)

1. Deeds § 6 —

The owner of lands executed a deed of gift thereto and delivered same to the grantee. Some three and a half years thereafter he acknowledged the deed and filed same for registration. Held: The acknowledgement of the execution was not a re-execution of the deed, and the deed of gift not having been registered within two years of its execution is void, C. S., 3315, and may not be revived by curative act of the Legislature.

2. Statutes § 5e —

Curative acts of the Legislature cannot revive void instruments.

APPEAL by plaintiffs from Stevens, J., at February Term, 1942, of GRANVILLE.

Parham Taylor for plaintiffs.

Royster Royster for defendants.


Civil action to assert title to certain real estate.

The facts pertinent to this appeal, and set forth in an agreed statement of facts, are substantially as follows: On 28 July, 1900, Marion J. McGhee executed a deed of gift, conveying to his wife, Emma P. McGhee, and her heirs, certain lands to be held by her during her marriage to him and as long as she remained a widow. Upon the death or marriage of the said Emma P. McGhee, said lands should go to her children. This deed was delivered to the grantee and held by her until 12 January, 1904, on which date, at the request of the grantor, the deed was delivered to him and he acknowledged the execution thereof before J. T. Britt, C. S.C., of Granville County, N.C. and filed the same for registration. After the deed was duly recorded, it was returned to Emma P. McGhee.

On 6 September, 1938, Marion J. McGhee and wife, Emma P. McGhee, executed a warranty deed to Violet H. McGhee, in her own right and as trustee. The grantors specifically reserved a life estate for and during the term of their joint lives and for the term of the natural life of the survivor. A two-thirds interest in the lands involved was conveyed to Violet H. McGhee in fee simple and one-third to her in trust for the benefit of Zula McGhee Cutts, nee Zula Elizabeth McGhee. The deed recites the fact that the former deed was without consideration and not recorded until nearly four years after its execution. The latter deed was duly acknowledged and filed for registration on 9 September, 1938, in the office of the register of deeds for Granville County, N.C.

Jury trial was waived and his Honor, upon the facts submitted, was requested to render judgment. His Honor held that the deed dated 28 July, 1900, filed for registration 12 January, 1904, is a deed of gift and void because the same was not recorded within two years after the making thereof. His Honor further held that the deed dated 6 September, 1938, from Marion J. McGhee and wife, Emma P. McGhee, to Violet H. McGhee, filed for registration as above set out, vests in Violet H. McGhee such title in the lands described in said deed as said deed purports and undertakes to convey. Judgment was entered accordingly. Plaintiffs except to the judgment and appeal to the Supreme Court and assign error.


The deed of gift executed 28 July, 1900, was not registered within two years from its execution, as required by Consolidated Statutes of North Carolina, sec. 3315, and was void at the time of its registration, 12 January, 1904. Curative acts of the Legislature do not revive void instruments. Booth v. Hairston, 193 N.C. 278, 136 S.E. 879; S. c., 195 N.C. 8, 141 S.E. 480; Reeves v. Miller, 209 N.C. 362, 183 S.E. 294; Allen v. Allen, 209 N.C. 744, 184 S.E. 485.

Acknowledgement of the execution of an instrument is not a re-execution of it.

His Honor's ruling in the court below was correct, and the judgment is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Cutts v. McGhee

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1942
20 S.E.2d 376 (N.C. 1942)
Case details for

Cutts v. McGhee

Case Details

Full title:ZULA McGHEE CUTTS AND T. W. CUTTS, HER HUSBAND, v. EMMA P. McGHEE AND…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1942

Citations

20 S.E.2d 376 (N.C. 1942)
20 S.E.2d 376

Citing Cases

Streadwick v. Warren

In other words, Ms. Streadwick appears to contend that even if Mr. McElrath intended to convey the Hoot Owl…

Winstead v. Woolard

The statute and decisions cited indicate that plaintiffs "have been told" the law aright, which, when applied…