From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cutter v. Wilkinson

U.S.
Oct 12, 2004
543 U.S. 924 (2004)

Summary

holding the RLUIPA an unconstitutional violation of the Establishment Clause

Summary of this case from Adkins v. Kaspar

Opinion

No. 03-9877.

October 12, 2004.


Certiorari Granted.

C.A. 6th Cir. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted. Reported below: 349 F. 3d 257.


Summaries of

Cutter v. Wilkinson

U.S.
Oct 12, 2004
543 U.S. 924 (2004)

holding the RLUIPA an unconstitutional violation of the Establishment Clause

Summary of this case from Adkins v. Kaspar

granting certiorari on the question of whether Congress violated the Establishment Clause by enacting RLUIPA

Summary of this case from Carney v. Chesney
Case details for

Cutter v. Wilkinson

Case Details

Full title:CUTTER ET AL. v. WILKINSON, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 12, 2004

Citations

543 U.S. 924 (2004)
125 S. Ct. 308

Citing Cases

Spratt v. Wall

These matters have been referred to me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) for a report and recommendation.…

Williams v. Bitner

The constitutionality of the RLUIPA is currently under consideration by the Supreme Court. See Cutter v.…