From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cutler Creek V. Townhouse v. Condo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 12, 1991
584 So. 2d 103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 91-1140.

July 30, 1991. Rehearing Denied September 12, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Robert Kaye, J.

Robert C. Eber, for appellant.

Robert E. Dillon, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.


Appellant, Cutler Creek Village Townhouse Association, Inc., appeals the issuance of a temporary injunction restraining appellant from using security gates to restrict access into certain areas. We affirm in part, and reverse in part.

We find that the injunction is defective in that it fails to comply with Rule 1.610(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires the posting of bond to pay costs and damages which could result from the issuance of a temporary injunction. See Minimatic Components, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, 494 So.2d 303 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

However, we also find that appellee adequately complied with all other requirements necessary for the issuance of the temporary injunction. Accordingly, we affirm the issuance of the temporary injunction, but reverse and remand for entry of an appropriate bond.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.


Summaries of

Cutler Creek V. Townhouse v. Condo

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 12, 1991
584 So. 2d 103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Cutler Creek V. Townhouse v. Condo

Case Details

Full title:CUTLER CREEK VILLAGE TOWNHOUSE ASSOCIATION, INC., APPELLANT, v. CUTLER…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 12, 1991

Citations

584 So. 2d 103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Med. Fac. v. Little Arch Creek

When a temporary injunction is granted, the party who has been enjoined is entitled to a bond as a matter of…

Lopez v. Paredes

If, on remand, appellees are successful in securing the temporary injunction, we would further point out that…