Cutler Bay Med. Servs., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Full title: CUTLER BAY MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., etc., Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL…

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Nov 17, 2021

336 So. 3d 765 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D21-145

11-17-2021

CUTLER BAY MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., etc., Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Corredor & Husseini, P.A., and Maria E. Corredor, for appellant. Birnbaum, Lippman & Gregoire, PLLC, and Nancy W. Gregoire Stamper (Fort Lauderdale); Kirwan Spellacy Danner Watkins & Brownstein, P.A., and Christopher L. Kirwan and R. Ryan Smith (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Corredor & Husseini, P.A., and Maria E. Corredor, for appellant.

Birnbaum, Lippman & Gregoire, PLLC, and Nancy W. Gregoire Stamper (Fort Lauderdale); Kirwan Spellacy Danner Watkins & Brownstein, P.A., and Christopher L. Kirwan and R. Ryan Smith (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and EMAS and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Brown v. Estate of Stuckey, 749 So. 2d 490, 498 (Fla. 1999) ("If an appellate court determines that reasonable persons could differ as to the propriety of the action taken by the trial court, there can be no finding of an abuse of discretion."); see also Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Ledoux, 230 So. 3d 530, 537-38 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (finding no abuse of discretion and affirming the denial of motions for mistrial and for new trial based on both preserved and unpreserved objections).