From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cutaio v. Crews

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Mar 27, 2013
Case No. 3:11cv538/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 27, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11cv538/LAC/EMT

03-27-2013

MICHAEL JOSEPH CUTAIO, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL D. CREWS, Respondent.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 4, 2013 (doc. 34). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

_______________

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cutaio v. Crews

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Mar 27, 2013
Case No. 3:11cv538/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Cutaio v. Crews

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL JOSEPH CUTAIO, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL D. CREWS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 27, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:11cv538/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 27, 2013)