From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cusick v. Kohl's Dep't Stores, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 22, 2011
Case No. CV 11-1970 DSF (OPx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-1970 DSF (OPx)

12-22-2011

Marie Cusick v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable DALE S. FISCHER, United States District Judge

+----------------------------+ ¦Debra Plato ¦Pamela Batalo ¦ +------------+---------------¦ ¦Deputy Clerk¦Court Reporter ¦ +----------------------------+

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Not present

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE REMAND TO STATE COURT

On December 14, 2011, Defendant removed this action from state court, claiming subject matter jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332, otherwise known as diversity jurisdiction. Removal must take place within 30 days after the receipt of a removable pleading. 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(1). Defendant's agent for service of process was served on October 19, 2011. (Notice of Removal ¶ 2; Holly Decl. ¶ 3.) It appears that Defendant's December 14 removal was untimely, and Defendant does not contend otherwise in its Notice of Removal.

Defendant is ordered to show cause in writing by January 3, 2012 why this case should not be remanded for untimely removal. If Plaintiff objects to removal, she must file a notice of the objection within 30 days of the notice of removal being filed. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cusick v. Kohl's Dep't Stores, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 22, 2011
Case No. CV 11-1970 DSF (OPx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Cusick v. Kohl's Dep't Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Marie Cusick v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 22, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 11-1970 DSF (OPx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2011)