From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cusic v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 11, 1987
512 So. 2d 309 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 87-2362.

September 11, 1987.

Appeal Pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Gerard J. O'Brien, Judge.


Greg Edward Cusic sought post-conviction relief in the trial court. Cusic contended that he was sentenced illegally because the trial judge departed from the recommended guidelines sentence for the reason that Cusic was an habitual offender. He claims the benefit of Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla. 1986), which held that the habitual offender statute is not an exemption to the sentencing guidelines and does not furnish a basis for exceeding the recommended guidelines sentence.

Cusic was convicted and sentenced in 1985. His conviction and sentence were affirmed by this court. Cusic v. State, 490 So.2d 950 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). We affirm the denial of Cusic's motion on the authority of McCuiston v. State, 507 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). In so doing, we acknowledge conflict with Hall v. State, 511 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

SCHEB, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and HALL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cusic v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 11, 1987
512 So. 2d 309 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Cusic v. State

Case Details

Full title:GREG EDWARD CUSIC, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 11, 1987

Citations

512 So. 2d 309 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Rowe v. State

This court has since held that Whitehead is not to be applied retroactively to habitual offender sentences…

Gilmore v. State

We have previously held that Whitehead should not be applied retroactively. Rowe v. State, 523 So.2d 620…