Opinion
Argued January 27, 1873
Decided February 11, 1873
W. Watson for the appellants.
A.R. Dyett for the respondents.
RAPALLO, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Argued January 27, 1873
Decided February 11, 1873
W. Watson for the appellants.
A.R. Dyett for the respondents.
RAPALLO, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Full title:J. HOLBROOK CUSHMAN et al., Executors, etc., Appellants, v . RACHEL A…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 11, 1873
In Loeschigk v. Hatfield (5 Robt. 26), it was held that a surviving partner could transfer the whole assets…
The First National Bank of Peru v. ParsonsIt is in accordance with the great weight of authority, and we think it was decided correctly. Egberts v.…