Cusati et Ux. v. Dellisanti

3 Citing cases

  1. Farhangui v. Grossinger

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-2002 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2021)   Cited 1 times

    Under Pennsylvania law, "partial payment on a contract bearing interest is to be applied first to the accrued interest with the balance applied towards the reduction of principal." Katzeff v. Fazio, 628 A.2d 425, 431 (Pa. Super. 1993); see also Cusati v. Dellisanti, 31 A.2d 604, 605 (Pa. Super. 1943). Accordingly, as of January 4, 2021, Farhangui is owed damages in the amount of $321,451.

  2. Acker v. Provident National Bank

    373 F. Supp. 56 (E.D. Pa. 1974)   Cited 7 times

    This is in harmony with the general rule that a partial payment on a contract bearing interest is to be applied first to the interest, and then the excess of the payment is to be applied to the principal. Cusati v. Dellisante, 152 Pa. Super. 223, 31 A.2d 604 (1943). Statement of Agreed Facts #32(c).

  3. Cipa v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

    155 Pa. Super. 339 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1944)   Cited 4 times

    His employment, in the sense the word is used in the policy, could be terminated only by the expiration of three months from the last day he actively worked for Jones and Laughlin; or by an earlier notice of termination given to defendant by Jones and Laughlin; or by a refusal by deceased of proffered re-employment at Jones and Laughlin's plant. Since the court below certified that it granted a new trial for the sole purpose of allowing evidence to be presented to show the character of Cipa's employment with National Tube Company, this Court has power to correct that error of law and enter such judgment as is warranted by the record: Cusati v. Dellisanti, 152 Pa. Super. 223, 31 A.2d 604. We should add that this precise factual situation has not heretofore been presented to the appellate courts.