From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. Vancary, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 3, 2012
No. 1:12-CV-00949-LJO-GSA (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1:12-CV-00949-LJO-GSA

10-03-2012

ALBERT GEORGE CURTIS, Plaintiff, v. VANCARY, INC., et al., Defendants.

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. Tanya E. Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff Albert George Curtis


Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Albert George Curtis

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

OF ACTION; ORDER

WHEREAS, Defendants have not filed an answer or motion for summary judgment;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants have settled the matter amongst themselves;

WHEREAS, no counterclaim has been filed;

Plaintiff hereby respectfully requests that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

_____________

Tanya E. Moore

Attorneys for Plaintiff Albert George Curtis

ORDER

Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Curtis v. Vancary, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 3, 2012
No. 1:12-CV-00949-LJO-GSA (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Curtis v. Vancary, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT GEORGE CURTIS, Plaintiff, v. VANCARY, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 3, 2012

Citations

No. 1:12-CV-00949-LJO-GSA (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2012)