From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. Vancary, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2012
CASE NO. CV F 12-0949 LJO GSA (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV F 12-0949 LJO GSA

09-06-2012

ALBERT GEORGE CURTIS, Plaintiff, v. VANCARY, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT

(Doc. 10.)

Plaintiff's counsel notified this Court that settlement has been reached among all parties. Pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than Ocotber 9, 2012, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause why the action has not been dismissed.

This Court VACATES all pending matters and dates, including the September 13, 2012 scheduling conference.

Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on counsel or parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules160 and 272. This Court ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they are expected to obey the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this Court deems appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Curtis v. Vancary, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2012
CASE NO. CV F 12-0949 LJO GSA (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Curtis v. Vancary, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT GEORGE CURTIS, Plaintiff, v. VANCARY, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 6, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. CV F 12-0949 LJO GSA (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2012)