From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A
Sep 13, 1956
88 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 1956)

Opinion

July 18, 1956. Rehearing Denied September 13, 1956.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Dade County; Ben C. Willard, Judge.

Charles J. Bodner and Rosenhouse Rosenhouse, Miami, for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Jos. P. Manners, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, and THOMAS, HOBSON and BUFORD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Curtis v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A
Sep 13, 1956
88 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 1956)
Case details for

Curtis v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARL C. CURTIS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division A

Date published: Sep 13, 1956

Citations

88 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 1956)