From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 2, 2020
292 So. 3d 904 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D19-3063

04-02-2020

Michael CURTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Michael Curtis, pro se, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Michael Curtis, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . The Court warns the appellant that any of his future filings that it determines to be frivolous may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this Court and a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2019) (providing that a prisoner who is found by a court to have brought a frivolous or malicious suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal is subject to disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections).

Roberts, Nordby, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Curtis v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 2, 2020
292 So. 3d 904 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Curtis v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL CURTIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Apr 2, 2020

Citations

292 So. 3d 904 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)