From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Feb 20, 2018
540 S.W.3d 436 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105617

02-20-2018

Derrick CURTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Gwenda Renee Robinson, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant. Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.


Gwenda Renee Robinson, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Derrick Curtis appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Curtis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Feb 20, 2018
540 S.W.3d 436 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Curtis v. State

Case Details

Full title:Derrick CURTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Feb 20, 2018

Citations

540 S.W.3d 436 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)