From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jan 31, 2013
No. 05-12-00032-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 31, 2013)

Opinion

No. 05-12-00032-CR

01-31-2013

LYDIA L. CURTIS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 401-82230-08

ORDER

The Court ORDERS this appeal removed from submission on January 29, 2013.

Appellant's counsel filed a brief on April 30, 2012 that purports to be an Anders brief. However, the brief does not fully comply with the requirements of Anders v. California. Specifically, although counsel states appellant waived a jury, was found competent to stand trial, and that certain motions were filed, the brief does not analyze those issues and the law related to the trial court's rulings. Moreover, appellant did not file a motion to withdraw as counsel that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5(a) and (b). Accordingly, we STRIKE the appellant's brief filed on April 30, 2012.

We ORDER counsel to file, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, either a motion to withdraw as counsel supported by a brief that complies with the requirements of Anders v. California or a brief that raises issues on the merits.

We DENY appellant's January 2, 2013 motion for appointment of new counsel.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Courtney Miller and the Collin County District Attorney's Office.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE

PRESIDING JUSTICE


Summaries of

Curtis v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jan 31, 2013
No. 05-12-00032-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Curtis v. State

Case Details

Full title:LYDIA L. CURTIS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jan 31, 2013

Citations

No. 05-12-00032-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 31, 2013)