Opinion
No. 17,732.
Filed May 18, 1948.
APPEAL — Contents of Brief — Insufficiency — No Questions Presented for Review. — Where appellant's brief does not set out a concise statement of the record, but in lieu thereof has a statement of facts which does not show he was entitled to an award, and under Propositions, Points, and Authorities sets out a section of the statute and asserts the term "unavailability" contained therein has no application in this case, no question has been presented to the court for review. Such brief fails to comply with Rules of Procedure and Practice in the Supreme and Appellate Courts, Rule 2-17.
From the Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division.
Proceeding by Johnnie D. Curtis for benefits under the State Employment Security Act. From a decision of the Review Board of the Indiana Security Division denying the claim, claimant appeals.
Affirmed. By the court in banc.
Russel White, of Indianapolis, attorney for appellant.
Cleon H. Foust, Attorney General, Winslow Van Horne, Deputy Attorney General, and Frank E. Coughlin, First Assistant Attorney General, and Fred R. Bechdolt, of Counsel, of Indianapolis.
Appellant has attempted to appeal a decision of the Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division denying his claim for benefits under the Indiana Employment Security Act.
Appellant's brief wholly fails to comply with the rules of the Supreme Court in that: it does not set out a concise statement of the record; in lieu of a condensed recital of the evidence in narrative form the brief has a statement of facts which does not show he was entitled to an award; under Propositions, Points and Authorities he sets out a section of the statute and asserts the term "unavailability" contained therein has no application in this case.
No question having been presented by appellant's brief, the award of the Review Board is affirmed.
NOTE. — Reported in 79 N.E.2d 215.