From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. Law Office of Rogelio Solis, PLLC

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jul 9, 2022
CIVIL Action. 7:21-cv-00187 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 9, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL Action. 7:21-cv-00187

07-09-2022

CATHERINE STONE CURTIS, TRUSTEE v. LAW OFFICE OF ROGELIO SOLIS, PLLC; AND ANA GOMEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND OBO ANNA ISABEL ORTIZ, DECEASED

Elizabeth M. Guffy Texas Bar Number 08592525 Matthew S. Okin Texas Bar No. 00784695 Simon R. Mayer Texas Bar Number 24060243 Locke Lord LLP David L. Curry, Jr. Texas Bar No. 24065107 Edward A. Clarkson, III Okin Adams, LLP Texas Bar No. 24059118 Attorneys for Defendants Attorneys for Catherine Stone Curtis, Chapter 7 Trustee


CHAPTER 7

Elizabeth M. Guffy

Texas Bar Number 08592525

Matthew S. Okin

Texas Bar No. 00784695

Simon R. Mayer

Texas Bar Number 24060243

Locke Lord LLP

David L. Curry, Jr.

Texas Bar No. 24065107

Edward A. Clarkson, III

Okin Adams, LLP

Texas Bar No. 24059118

Attorneys for Defendants

Attorneys for Catherine Stone Curtis, Chapter 7 Trustee

ORDER

Ricardo H. Hinojosa, United States District Judge

In connection with the Defendants' Motion to Withdraw the Reference [Adv. Docket No. 42] filed by the Law Office of Rogelio Solis, PLLC and Ana Gomez, the bankruptcy court issued its Report and Recommendation to the United States District Court that Defendants Law Office of Rogellio Solis, PLLC and Ana Gomez's Motion to Withdraw the Reference be Granted [Adv. Docket No. 56] recommending that this Court withdraw the reference as to Adversary Proceeding Number 21-07002, but only after the Bankruptcy Court has certified that all pretrial and dispositive matters have concluded and the Adversary Proceeding is ready for trial.

The Court finds that the Bankruptcy Court's recommendation is well founded and should be adopted. It is therefore, ORDERED that the Bankruptcy Court's report and recommendation is hereby adopted. It is further

ORDERED that the reference will be withdrawn as to Adversary Proceeding Number 2107002 upon the Bankruptcy Court's certification that it is ready for trial. And it is further

ORDERED that the Bankruptcy Court is authorized to hear, adjudicate, and otherwise resolve all pretrial matters, including all dispositive motions, provided, however, that for any matter the resolution of which would result in the issuance of a final order or other such order as would be subject to immediate appeal as a matter of right, the Bankruptcy Court may hear such matter, but shall submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to the Court, and any final order or judgement shall be entered by the Court.


Summaries of

Curtis v. Law Office of Rogelio Solis, PLLC

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jul 9, 2022
CIVIL Action. 7:21-cv-00187 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Curtis v. Law Office of Rogelio Solis, PLLC

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE STONE CURTIS, TRUSTEE v. LAW OFFICE OF ROGELIO SOLIS, PLLC; AND…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Jul 9, 2022

Citations

CIVIL Action. 7:21-cv-00187 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 9, 2022)