From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. Kathleen Stanfield Amended & Restated Trust

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov 21, 2014
158 So. 3d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2D14–2671.

11-21-2014

James T. CURTIS, Jr., Trustee, Petitioner, v. The KATHLEEN STANFIELD AMENDED AND RESTATED TRUST dated May 2, 2006, Respondent.

Jonathan W. Newton, Dade City, for Petitioner. Charles D. Waller of Law Office of Waller & Scharber, P.A., Dade City, for Respondent. Stephen D. Carle, pro se.


Jonathan W. Newton, Dade City, for Petitioner.

Charles D. Waller of Law Office of Waller & Scharber, P.A., Dade City, for Respondent.

Stephen D. Carle, pro se.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Denied.

DAVIS, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and KELLY, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Curtis v. Kathleen Stanfield Amended & Restated Trust

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov 21, 2014
158 So. 3d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Curtis v. Kathleen Stanfield Amended & Restated Trust

Case Details

Full title:James T. CURTIS, Jr., Trustee, Petitioner, v. The KATHLEEN STANFIELD…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Nov 21, 2014

Citations

158 So. 3d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)