Curtis v. Harrington

Full title: REAMEL CURTIS, Plaintiff, v. KELLI HARRINGTON, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 20, 2018

1:15-cv-00553-LJO-EPG-PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2018)

Opinion

1:15-cv-00553-LJO-EPG-PC

02-20-2018

REAMEL CURTIS, Plaintiff, v. KELLI HARRINGTON, et al., Defendants.

Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DENIED (ECF No. 35, 54)

Curtis Reamel ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On January 24, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations that Defendants J. Bugarin and J. Gonzales' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 35) be denied. (ECF No. 54.) The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties that same day and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty-one days. (Id.) Neither party timely filed an objection to the Findings and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed January 24, 2018, (ECF No. 54) are adopted in full;

2. Defendants J. Bugarin and J. Gonzales' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 35) is DENIED; and

3. This action shall proceed only against defendants J. Bugarin and J. Gonzales on Plaintiff's failure to protect claim.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 20 , 2018

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE