From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. Brown

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 6, 2007
Civil Case No. 07-cv-00656-LTB-MEH (D. Colo. Jul. 6, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 07-cv-00656-LTB-MEH.

July 6, 2007


ORDER


This case is before me on the "Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant to Rule 56(f) and Other Grounds" (Doc 15). Defendants have filed their response in opposition and Plaintiffs have now filed their reply. Plaintiffs' motion implicates Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The motion to dismiss asserting failure to a claim upon which relief can be granted will be determined upon the allegations in the complaint upon the applicable Rule 12(b)(6) standards without converting the motion to one for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 avoiding the need to conduct timely and expensive discovery further delaying resolution of the motion to dismiss. Accordingly

IT IS ORDERED Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time Pursuant to Rule 56(f) and Other Grounds (Doc 15) is DENIED. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file their response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss within 20 days from the date of this order and Defendants shall have 10 days to reply.


Summaries of

Curtis v. Brown

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 6, 2007
Civil Case No. 07-cv-00656-LTB-MEH (D. Colo. Jul. 6, 2007)
Case details for

Curtis v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:CHUCK CURTIS, DARREN LEHRICH, and DOUGLAS HAYNES, Plaintiffs, v. RICHARD…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jul 6, 2007

Citations

Civil Case No. 07-cv-00656-LTB-MEH (D. Colo. Jul. 6, 2007)