From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtis v. Benda

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Sep 2, 2011
NO. C08-5109 BHS/KLS (W.D. Wash. Sep. 2, 2011)

Opinion

NO. C08-5109 BHS/KLS.

September 2, 2011


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to respond to Defendant Riley's motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 193. Plaintiff has recently obtained counsel and counsel will require additional time to review the files and adequately respond to the motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 193. Defendant Riley is not opposed to an extension of sixty days. ECF No. 195.

Counsel is directed to correct his pleadings to show that Judge Benjamin H. Settle is the presiding District Judge in this case.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiff's motion for extension (ECF No. 193) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his response to Defendant's motion for summary judgment on or before October 31, 2011. Defendant may file a reply on or before November 4, 2011. The Clerk is directed to re-note Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 191) for November 4, 2011.

(2) The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants.


Summaries of

Curtis v. Benda

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Sep 2, 2011
NO. C08-5109 BHS/KLS (W.D. Wash. Sep. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Curtis v. Benda

Case Details

Full title:JAMES EDWARD CURTIS, Plaintiff, v. TERRY J. BENDA and WILLIAM E. RILEY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Sep 2, 2011

Citations

NO. C08-5109 BHS/KLS (W.D. Wash. Sep. 2, 2011)