From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtin v. Bowery Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1989
150 A.D.2d 327 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

May 1, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs allege in their complaint that the defendant bank, without authority, entered the safe-deposit box which the plaintiffs rented. The defendant alleges that the entry was authorized because of nonpayment of the rental fee. The complaint states 13 causes of action, including 6 causes of action to recover damages for emotional distress. The court granted those branches of the defendant's motion which were to dismiss those causes of action.

In order to sustain an action to recover damages for the intentional infliction of emotional harm, the plaintiffs "must show that the * * * bank committed an outrageous act and that the desire to cause plaintiffs emotional distress was more than incidental to proper business motives of the [bank]" (O'Rourke v Pawling Sav. Bank, 80 A.D.2d 847, appeal dismissed 54 N.Y.2d 641). The actions of the defendant bank in this case were not outrageous so as to constitute the basis for an action sounding in the intentional infliction of emotional distress. Moreover, "[t]here is no cause of action for emotional distress and ensuing injury caused by observation or awareness of unintended damage to one's property" (Stahli v McGlynn, 47 A.D.2d 238, 240). Bracken, J.P., Kooper, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Curtin v. Bowery Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1989
150 A.D.2d 327 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Curtin v. Bowery Savings Bank

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET CURTIN et al., Appellants, v. BOWERY SAVINGS BANK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1989

Citations

150 A.D.2d 327 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Waldron v. Rotzler

Fowler v. Town of Ticonderoga, 131 A.D.2d 919, 516 N.Y.S.2d 368, 370 (3d Dep't 1987). Nor, may plaintiff…

Waldron v. Ball Corp.

Plaintiff is not, therefore, a proper party to allege fraud (see, Orlin v Torf, 126 A.D.2d 252, 254, lv…