From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curtin Mar. Corp. v. Barge Org

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 26, 2011
Case No.: CV-11-4773 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: CV-11-4773 EMC

10-26-2011

CURTIN MARITIME CORP. Plaintiff, v. BARGE ORG, Official No. 1125140, its Rigging, Tackle, Machinery, Equipment, Apparel, Appurtenances, etc., In Rem, BARGE BAY, Official No. 1125142, its Rigging, Tackle, Machinery, Equipment, Apparel, Appurtenances, etc., In Rem, and DOES 1-10. Defendants.

COX, WOOTTON, GRIFFIN, HANSEN & POULOS, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff CURTIN MARITIME CORP. BRODSKY MICKLOW BULL & WEISS LLP Philip E. Weiss (SBN 152523) Attorneys for Owner MILTON BLANKENSHIP


COX, WOOTTON, GRIFFIN,

HANSEN & POULOS, LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CURTIN MARITIME CORP.

BRODSKY MICKLOW BULL & WEISS LLP

Philip E. Weiss (SBN 152523)

Attorneys for Owner

MILTON BLANKENSHIP

IN ADMIRALTY STIPULATION FOR

SUBSTITUTE SECURITY PURSUANT TO SUPP. FED. R.

CIV. PROC. FOR ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME CLAIMS, RULE

E(5)(a)


ORDER

WHEREAS, in the above entitled cause a Verified Complaint in rem was filed on September 26, 2011 by plaintiff CURTIN MARITIME CORP. ("Curtin") against the defendant barges ORG, Official No. 1125140, its Rigging, Tackle, Machinery, Equipment, Apparel, Appurtenances, etc. and BAY, Official No. 1125142, its Rigging, Tackle, Machinery, Equipment, Apparel, Appurtenances, etc., (collectively "Barges") for the reasons and causes set forth in the Verified Complaint; and

WHEREAS, it has been agreed between Curtin and the owner of the Barges, Milton Blankenship ("Owner"), by and through their undersigned attorneys of record, that the execution of process against and the arrest of the defendant Barges shall be waived in consideration of the filing of this stipulation and the acceptance by the Court of the substitute security as described below.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Undersigned stipulate and agree that:

1. This Court has in rem jurisdiction over the defendant Barges, and over the substitute res (cash deposit), as provided for below in the next paragraph.

2. By operation of maritime law, the filing of this Stipulation and the deposit of the cash amount as described below in the next paragraph, as substitute security for the Barges pursuant to Rule E5(a) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Supplemental Rules"), shall extinguish the Plaintiff's maritime liens against the Barges and transfer this Court's in rem jurisdiction to the substitute security.

3. In consideration for Plaintiff waiving the arrest of the Barges, the Owner agrees to abide by all orders and judgments, interlocutory or final, of the Court or of any appellate court if an appeal shall intervene or be taken, and shall satisfy any final judgment rendered in favor of the Plaintiff and against the defendant Barges in this action together with prejudgment interest at 6% per annum and costs not to exceed the sum of Two Hundred and Ten Thousand U.S. dollars ($210,000.00). Owner shall deposit said amount in cash or bank check into the Registry of this Court, which shall serve as substitute security for the Barges ("Substitute Security").

4. This Stipulation is binding on the Owner whether the Barges be lost or not lost, and is given without prejudice to all rights or defenses which the Barges may have, none of which are to be regarded as waived.

5. This Stipulation shall not affect the rights of the Owner which shall be precisely the same as they would have been had the Barges, in fact, been taken into custody by the U.S. Marshal under this Court's duly issued in rem process, and released by the filing of a claim and a release bond pursuant to Supplemental Rule E5(a).

6. The Substitute Security shall remain in the custody of the Court until an appropriate order from this Court directs the Clerk to disburse the funds.

7. Upon a final judgment being issued in this matter, or in the event this action is consolidated with another civil action asserting related claims, in that consolidated action, including any and all appeals, the Undersigned, or either of them, may move the Court for an order disbursing the Substitute Security to the prevailing party in the amount of said judgment. Any amount remaining after such disbursement shall be returned to the Owner.

8. If this case is resolved by settlement, the parties to the settlement shall jointly move this Court for an order disbursing the Substitute Security according to the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

Max L. Kelley

Attorney-in-Fact for Plaintiff

CURTIN MARITIME CORP.

Philip E. Weiss

Attorney-in-Fact for the Owner of the

Defendant Barges ORG and BAY

IT IS SO ORDERED that the status conference set for 10/28/11 at 3:00 p.m. is vacated. The CMC set for 1/6/12 remains on calendar,

Edward M. Chen

U.S. District Ju


Summaries of

Curtin Mar. Corp. v. Barge Org

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 26, 2011
Case No.: CV-11-4773 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Curtin Mar. Corp. v. Barge Org

Case Details

Full title:CURTIN MARITIME CORP. Plaintiff, v. BARGE ORG, Official No. 1125140, its…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 26, 2011

Citations

Case No.: CV-11-4773 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)