Curry v. Van Hook

Full title: WILLIAM CURRY, JR., Petitioner, v. WILLIAM VAN HOOK, Respondent.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Nov 6, 2017

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05314-RBL-JRC (W.D. Wash. Nov. 6, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05314-RBL-JRC

11-06-2017

WILLIAM CURRY, JR., Petitioner, v. WILLIAM VAN HOOK, Respondent.

Ronald B. Leighton United States District Judge

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) Petitioner has not yet received a judgment and has not exhausted his state court remedies. Therefore, his habeas petition is DISMISSED without prejudice.

DATED this 6^th day of November, 2017.

/s/_________

Ronald B. Leighton

United States District Judge