From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curry v. Nassau Electric Railroad Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 1, 1910
92 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1910)

Opinion

Argued February 18, 1910

Decided March 1, 1910

D.A. Marsh and George D. Yeomans for appellant.

Henry F. Cochrane and Harry J. Walsh for respondent.


The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the evidence presented a question of fact for the jury on the question whether the defendant's servants used excessive and unnecessary force in removing the plaintiff from the defendant's car and that, hence, the motion for a nonsuit was properly denied; and that the question argued by defendant's counsel, as to the obligation of the defendant's employees to accept the five-dollar bill tendered and give change therefor is not raised by any exception which this court can review.

CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER and HISCOCK, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Curry v. Nassau Electric Railroad Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 1, 1910
92 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1910)
Case details for

Curry v. Nassau Electric Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK CURRY, Respondent, v . THE NASSAU ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 1, 1910

Citations

92 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1910)
92 N.E. 1099