From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Curry v. Haynes

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 17, 2023
3:22-CV-5493-LK-DWC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 17, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-CV-5493-LK-DWC

01-17-2023

VERNON LEWIS CURRY, JR., Petitioner, v. RONALD HAYNES, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION

DAVID W. CHRISTEL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The District Court has referred this habeas corpus action to United States Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. Before the Court is respondent's motion for a 14-day extension of time to file his Answer (Dkt. 24). Respondent's counsel states he been ill with COVID-19 and has been unable to complete his work on the Answer and exhibits. Id. Counsel represents that petitioner's counsel does not object to the extension. Id.

The Court finds good cause exists for an extension and GRANTS respondent's motion. Respondent shall file his Answer on or before January 27, 2023.


Summaries of

Curry v. Haynes

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 17, 2023
3:22-CV-5493-LK-DWC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Curry v. Haynes

Case Details

Full title:VERNON LEWIS CURRY, JR., Petitioner, v. RONALD HAYNES, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jan 17, 2023

Citations

3:22-CV-5493-LK-DWC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 17, 2023)